There’s a good reason why customer-facing teams are quick to fly across the country to meet with prospects and clients or conduct video-based calls with their highest-value customers: People, including and especially your customer base, both appreciate and desire regular interactions with other people — even brand representatives. Meeting one-on-one with colleagues, partners, leads, and clientele live — whether in the actual flesh or via real-time video conference feeds — has always been the best way to develop, maintain, and enhance crucial business relationships. In the age of (gradually improving) artificial intelligence — in other words, the era of chatbots, automated emails, and “self-serve” technology — making time to meet individuals with whom you have a professional relationship has become the ultimate competitive differentiator. Whether you’re a B2C customer service agent aiming to provide top-tier support to existing subscribers or a B2B sales rep demoing your company’s software to potential clients, face-to-face communication is your best bet for building and sustaining personal relationships with buyers and prospects alike and, in turn, achieving your principal business goals. Given how convincing face-to-face business communications is for brands of all types today compared with approaches like AI-powered chatbots and semi-personalized emails, it’s easy to see why so many professionals continue to turn to in-person and video meetings to nurture interested leads, maintain contact with customers, and re-engage cold clients. Live, face-to-face conversations aren’t just a differentiator with customers and competitors, though. They’re also helpful in streamlining internal communications across your organization. More than half of employee respondents in a recent Nextiva survey (53%) cited face-to-face communications as the most effective method for colleague interactions, outranking email. Some workers are trying to talk less to lean on low-bandwidth communication for their teams. But what many of these workers don’t understand is that by scheduling the right meetings at the right cadence and with clearly outlined expectations and objectives for each meeting — one-offs and recurring discussions alike — they can more easily remain in sync with and on the same page as their colleagues and ensure they get the most value from said meetings.